Just an aside here :
I fitted an ECO 20A MMPT solar regulator into our caravan as a replacement for the originally-fitted PWM device back in 2017 Obviously that was done to improve the battery charging system. A side issue was the thought that I might have to "quieten" it to enable me to operate HF or VHF portable from the van whilst away travelling.
The original PWM device 'roared', the MPPT was not quite as bad as just-connected-in-lieu and nothing else added. The incoming solar charger leads were then fed through a heavy duty rocker switch then via a large powdered-iron toroid, one for each lead (+ve and -ve), and that made a large difference. I then filtered the outgoing DC leads in the same way, and the QRN was reduced further. The addition of a 470uF 50V electro on both the input pair after the filtering toroid (ie directly on the regulator connection terminals), and the output as well dropped the QRN levels even further. A high-ish value ceramic disc cap was added in parallel with each of the 470uF caps and now there is virtually no solar regulator hash evident.
I can work HF or VHF using antenas mounted off the caravan's structure (so very close physically) and you would think that if there was going to be QRN, there would be. The in-from-the-panel switch is useful in disconnecting the charge current when confirming/isolating any noise sources, and I have found other caravans in van parks generating lots but switching off the incoming current to my regulator makes nil or slight difference only.
These days I just set up the van as usual when we arrive on-site, eventually unload my "portable box", connect either AC or DC power and the antenna-of-choice-for-today, and I realised just then that I don't even bother to see if there is any van-based QRN affecting the setup - there just isn't anything significant. So you can apply simple hash-reducing methods and get substantial improvement at little cost. Try it.
Doug