VK4ADC > 03-02-2021, 12:09 PM
VK4ADC > 04-02-2021, 07:16 AM
VK5TM > 04-02-2021, 08:12 AM
(04-02-2021, 07:16 AM)VK4ADC Wrote: The no-protection state is referred to in the very last line of the extract, although it does not expand on it. What is known is that CB licensees are a no interference-protection basis, either suffering from - or - generated by. That would then apply to amateurs too.
VK4ADC > 04-02-2021, 08:56 AM
VK6ZFG > 05-02-2021, 06:05 PM
VK2CSW > 05-02-2021, 07:12 PM
VK5TM > 05-02-2021, 07:37 PM
VK2CSW > 05-02-2021, 07:51 PM
VK4ADC > 06-02-2021, 07:04 AM
(05-02-2021, 07:37 PM)VK5TM Wrote: 14,762 from the ACMA's own figures (see Doug's second post), so at $55 = $811,910.
Not much bargaining power there.
VK5TM > 06-02-2021, 09:37 AM
(06-02-2021, 07:04 AM)VK4ADC Wrote: I agree that the "no interference / no protection" state has been in place for years, even if not officially.
There could be a side effect on the likes of our Intruder Watch operations under a Class Licence where we are not afforded ANY protection. Is that important ?
VK4SMJ > 06-02-2021, 02:58 PM
VK4ADC > 06-02-2021, 03:23 PM
VK4ADC > 08-02-2021, 01:54 PM
VK4ADC > 13-02-2021, 01:29 PM
VK4ADC > 21-02-2021, 02:41 PM
VK4ADC > 28-02-2021, 07:36 AM
VK2CSW > 09-03-2021, 11:47 AM
VK5TM > 09-03-2021, 02:10 PM
VK4ADC > 09-03-2021, 02:28 PM
(09-03-2021, 11:47 AM)VK2CSW Wrote: As it is a cost cutting exercise the Class Licence option is most likely, which is sad as it would remove the CEPT approval and thus reciprocal licencing but otherwise I am not sure it would have that much impact.
VK2CSW > 09-03-2021, 02:46 PM