+- Australian Ham Radio Discussion Forum ( AHRDF ) (https://www.ahrdf.net/forum)
+-- Forum: MISCELLANEOUS (https://www.ahrdf.net/forum/forum-31.html)
+--- Forum: W.I.A. / ITU / IARU (https://www.ahrdf.net/forum/forum-26.html)
+--- Thread: WIA reform group (/thread-6.html)
WIA reform group - VK5ZLR - 09-09-2016
I reckon these blokes have the right idea, hopefully they can get traction.
[url]http://wiarg.org/[/url
Re: WIA reform group - VK4ADC - 09-09-2016
The link that works is... http://wiarg.org/
I haven't really looked at that web site before but will do so in the near future.
Doug VK4ADC
Re: WIA reform group - VK3BQ - 10-09-2016
The current WIA is loosing more than $1000 of its members funds a week. it's been well and truly RRF'ed. the contempt old guard don't believe their is a problem. 3 board members in recent months have called out the incompetence. Maybe these 3 are expecting too much of the old mans club. If you don't believe the WIARG. Please listen to Andrew s in wa and Paul s in SA. They are saying the same as Rowan from NSW said late last year.
WIA reform group wants a strong and meaningful WIA. We want the hobby to survive past xmas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: WIA reform group - admin - 10-09-2016
Just a friendly warning:
Do not attack any individual else you will be removed permanently from the forum rather than the topic being locked (as it was in VKLogger).
No recourse either. The judges decision is final.
Admin
Re: WIA reform group - VK6KXW - 10-09-2016
I agree with the Admin we don't need another range war starting up on OzLogger or the VKlogger like years of yore.
Plenty of forums on Skype or Facebook.
Also another note be mindful that ACMA could well be monitoring the Flogger and OZLogger a
case of "LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS!"
Peter, VK6KXW
Re: WIA reform group - VK3RX - 10-09-2016
Quote:I agree with the Admin we don't need another range war starting up on OzLogger or the VKlogger like years of yore.Concur.
Plenty of forums on Skype or Facebook.
Re: WIA reform group - VK3XL - 12-09-2016
I agree with the Admin. There are plenty of places to go into battle with opinions regarding issues like the WIA Board, but I don't think this is the right place.
Re: WIA reform group - VK3XL - 12-09-2016
I agree with the Admin. There are plenty of places to go into battle with opinions regarding issues like the WIA Board, but I don't think this is the right place.
Re: WIA reform group - VK3YCQ - 30-09-2016
VK6KXW Wrote:I agree with the Admin we don't need another range war starting up on OzLogger or the VKlogger like years of yore.
Plenty of forums on Skype or Facebook.
Also another note be mindful that ACMA could well be monitoring the Flogger and OZLogger a
case of "LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS!"
Peter, VK6KXW
Is that what Admin said... to not have a 'range war'' (however you define that)? Forgive me if I misinterpret what was said, but surely it is reasonable to have a fair and open discussion about some of the issues we all face as amateur radio operators (and there are a few). People are entitled to have an opinion on important questions. All I would ask is that opinions be expressed fairly without the personal attacks and character assassination that we see on social media and sometimes on air. Where claims are being made about an organization, assertions about impropriety should be reasonable and supported by evidence. To do otherwise is to risk being easily dismissed and ridiculed. Is it worth forfeiting your right to legitimate criticism by indulging in rants? I think not. Also, groundless attacks on individuals might well lead to defamation claims in court and the possibility of huge payouts. As the publisher of the forum, Admin would potentially be a party to such an action and so would be fully justified in removing comments and banning the person who put them there.
Need we be fearful of the ACMA 'monitoring' us? To assume that they don't would be foolhardy. Does it matter if they know what we are thinking about the institutions that we depend upon to represent us? Perhaps it would be better if we were a united group with a coherent set of policies and positions, however, there will, in any pluralist democracy, be conflicts and disagreements from time to time. This may be regarded as healthy if it brings about positive changes to the way we do things.
Just my 2 cents worth.
73s,
Ian